The Right Way to Contradict Another Doctor

Everyone—even me, as a marketer—will face moments when other professionals challenge your point of view, expertise, or knowledge. Or maybe you’ll be the one doing the challenging.

It’s not always pleasant, but when it happens, you can leverage it to strengthen your authority, build credibility, and position yourself as a thought leader.

Done poorly, though, it can make you look combative, damage professional relationships, and create unnecessary controversy.

The goal of this article? To show you how to challenge misinformation (or differing interpretations) without harming your reputation.

Table of Contents

• 1. Keep It About the Science, Not the Person

• 2. Use Data, Not Just Opinions

• 3. Acknowledge the Complexity

• 4. Choose Your Platform Wisely

• 5. Maintain a Neutral, Professional Tone

• 6. Anticipate and Address Counterarguments

• Preventing Polarization Among Your Audience

• Final Thoughts

1. Keep It About the Science, Not the Person

The fastest way to lose credibility is to make it personal.

Instead of saying, “Dr. X is completely wrong about this,” frame it as:

• “While Dr. X raises an important point, recent studies suggest a different interpretation.”

• “The latest clinical trials indicate that the risks may be higher than previously thought.”

This approach shifts the focus to evidence-based discussion rather than personal critique. It also helps prevent defensive reactions that could escalate into an unproductive back-and-forth.

2. Use Data, Not Just Opinions

Your argument should be grounded in solid evidence.

When possible, cite reputable studies, medical guidelines, or expert consensus:

• “According to a 2023 study in The Lancet, this treatment showed no significant benefit in patients over 50.”

• “The WHO and CDC both recommend X based on a review of over 50 clinical trials.”

Let the research speak for itself. When you rely on objective data, your argument carries more weight.

3. Acknowledge the Complexity

Medical knowledge evolves. Rarely is a topic completely black and white.

Recognizing nuances makes you sound thoughtful and credible:

• “There are still debates about this, but the majority of research currently supports X.”

• “While some early studies suggested benefits, newer trials have raised concerns about safety.”

This prevents polarization and encourages open discussion rather than rigid opposition.

4. Choose Your Platform Wisely

Where and how you voice disagreement matters. A social media thread? A well-researched article? A direct conversation?

• Public forum (LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, etc.): Keep it professional and focused on patient education.

• Medical conferences or journals: More technical detail and direct discussion are appropriate.

• Private outreach: If the disagreement is significant but not urgent, consider reaching out first to discuss before making it public.

Being strategic about your platform helps maintain credibility and prevents unnecessary drama.

5. Maintain a Neutral, Professional Tone

Even if the other doctor is blatantly wrong, avoid sarcasm, condescension, or frustration.

Keep your tone composed and informative. Instead of:

❌ “This is completely inaccurate and dangerous advice.”

Try:

“This recommendation is not aligned with current guidelines. Here’s what the evidence suggests.”

People are more likely to listen if they don’t feel attacked.

6. Anticipate and Address Counterarguments

If you’re publicly contradicting someone, assume their supporters will push back. Prepare for common objections:

• If they argue personal experience over data: “Anecdotal cases can be valuable, but large-scale studies help us understand broader trends.”

• If they cite outdated research: “Earlier studies suggested that, but more recent research has provided new insights.”

Handling counterarguments gracefully strengthens your credibility.

Preventing Polarization Among Your Audience

1. Emphasize Shared Goals

Find common ground to prevent people from picking sides:

• “We all want the best outcomes for patients. The key question is what the latest science tells us.”

• “This is an evolving field, and as more data comes in, we refine our approach.”

2. Don’t Dismiss; Reframe Instead

People don’t like being told they’re wrong. Instead of rejecting an idea outright, guide your audience toward a better understanding:

• Instead of “That’s a myth,” 
  say: “That’s a common belief, but the latest research actually shows…”

• Instead of “That treatment doesn’t work,” 
  say: “The data suggests that another approach is more effective.”

This small shift makes a big difference in how your message is received.

Final Thoughts

Professional disagreements are a normal part of scientific discourse. The goal isn’t to “win” an argument—it’s to ensure that accurate, evidence-based information reaches the public and medical community.

By maintaining professionalism, using data, acknowledging complexity, and preventing polarization, you can strengthen your personal brand while contributing to meaningful medical discussions.

Handled well, a disagreement doesn’t just make you look knowledgeable—it makes you a leader in your field.

Ready to take advantage of these scenarios? Get our free resource by clicking below. 👇